{"findings":[{"claimIds":["C2","C4"],"code":"BOUNDED_SIZE_EFFECT_OK","evidenceIds":["ev-bda147b677efa8d3addea7535a4f6e5672ef9276bf4c3510a31acbab5cb6ffcf","ev-6b334ba93cd690401948064f998e6dbdbfb51c69944fe6382520f626101543ef"],"explanation":"The draft's quantitative summaries match the original abstracts: E138 states the 5% O₂/15% CO₂ atmosphere reduced Botrytis incidence by 63% vs control, firmness above threshold 12 days vs 6 days, and marketability at day 10; C2 reports these figures and explicitly limits them ('relative to control, does not imply sub-1% absolute', 'sensory panel day 10 falls short of 14-day target'). E073 reports 38 vs 210 min cooling, 14 h earlier O₂ equilibration, lower Botrytis at day 8; C4 carries the same numbers and notes day-8 outcomes do not demonstrate day-14 performance. No overstated universal or deployment claim is present.","id":"F1","recheckQuestion":"Do the quoted numerical results in C2 and C4 remain identical to the values in E138 and E073?","scope":"run","severity":"advisory"},{"claimIds":["C3"],"code":"FILM_TRANSFER_BOUNDED","evidenceIds":["ev-80eca36a544ce3fe1b178ebcaad01fce2fd20b2d7b849a79980c3340d72dda3d","ev-a41defb14c938608bcaf3fb079bd01e534f81ec53c74f4c5cff89c186c70c196","ev-beb656c1e3b9e50b412637677df85c860d6d41f10f11561580ac314d9dd7d009"],"explanation":"C3 attributes the 12-film OTR/CO₂TR screening, finite-element permeation modelling and 55% mould reduction to E087, and E140 confirms R0976 is author 3 on that record. The draft's limitation notes that the tray was mixed-berry and that the film spec (OTR 3,800, CO₂TR 18,000) cannot be transferred to the company's 125 g rPET punnet without local verification. The inference is therefore properly bounded; it does not claim the company's punnet will achieve the same result.","id":"F2","recheckQuestion":"Does C3 avoid asserting transferability of the mixed-berry film specification to the 125 g rPET punnet beyond local verification?","scope":"claim","severity":"advisory"},{"claimIds":["C5"],"code":"MODEL_SCOPE_MISMATCH_BOUNDED","evidenceIds":["ev-3494271a8665eb49e6b1619562714f7faec2d6155a41e9632051e6d3c50db4d2","ev-56865f93b4c1121fda88c2f3b372983e9c06f23af354f1eeb240af97cc900b6a","ev-9ee6767af448386d19bccb85108bf5b5decab35c3dcb09d1a1874682abaec387","ev-2edf60541dc8e19f0c9f37c2f3471e784657dd66ec8a31d8598cc5d4bb6fdfba"],"explanation":"C5's digital-twin figures (88% flagged, 9% false positives, four exporters, 240 consignments) match E040, and the Monte Carlo 91% coverage and 180 consignments match E064. E064 is on strawberry total aerobic count, and the draft says so in its limitation and notes that Botrytis-specific raspberry calibration is separate. This is honestly labelled and does not overstate the evidence as validated raspberry Botrytis prediction.","id":"F3","recheckQuestion":"Is the strawberry/aerobic-count basis of the Monte Carlo model disclosed and kept separate from Botrytis-specific prediction in the draft?","scope":"claim","severity":"advisory"},{"claimIds":["C6","C4"],"code":"CHAPTER_AND_PRECOOLING_SUPPORTED","evidenceIds":["ev-4b3b56deb17fdff8a2c416e981826a6ce06e244e7b45fe0e80cbb3085670ca1a","ev-6b334ba93cd690401948064f998e6dbdbfb51c69944fe6382520f626101543ef"],"explanation":"E055 is a book chapter covering gas mass balance, film permeability selection, tray geometry effects on headspace equilibration and a worked forced-air pre-cooling + MAP example for a mid-sized raspberry exporter; C6 reproduces this and correctly frames it as a methodological reference, not validation. The technicalRationale line linked to C4 ('links equilibration speed and free moisture to Botrytis incidence, relevant to the company's micro-condensation hypothesis') stays within what E073 supports (hydrocooling free moisture promoting calyx decay) without claiming micro-condensation control is proven.","id":"F4","recheckQuestion":"Does the technicalRationale for C4 avoid claiming demonstrated micro-condensation control in the 125 g rPET punnet?","scope":"claim","severity":"advisory"},{"claimIds":["C8","C9","C10","C11"],"code":"SCOPE_AND_PARTICIPATION_APPROPRIATELY_BOUNDED","evidenceIds":["ev-96b8969c395c9216a3f367b33f3e76adde7079b1082f4e40f8d62a3618108492","ev-1dc8d54eaa6a86588bdaa7d6ce85f0c5cf53b38ea41939d332a4603a6325a7f0","ev-b5793075e08d411021b1ea6e7fd4631495e8ad26f55e34b44f53fc2afa0ee230","ev-4b3b56deb17fdff8a2c416e981826a6ce06e244e7b45fe0e80cbb3085670ca1a"],"explanation":"The proposal sections correctly refuse to guarantee the customer's <1% day-14 target (C8, constraints, unknowns), describe a bounded film-specification/trial-design contribution grounded in the candidate's registered MAP/film/cold-chain work (C9, C10), and state the participation form as joint project and/or industrial PhD supervision consistent with E101/E015. C11's claim of prior work with three fruit exporters matches E015 verbatim, and the section correctly notes the exact engagement form is not specified. This meets the cooperation-support requirement with registered evidence of a concrete contribution to the core modelling gap, without implying unlimited availability, guaranteed success or completed deployment.","id":"F5","recheckQuestion":"Does the proposal continue to state the <1% day-14 outcome as the company's goal rather than a demonstrated result, and to confine the contribution to registered MAP/film/cold-chain competence?","scope":"run","severity":"advisory"}],"hash":"d754c4b0ffc7a81352a1d8dfbdba643389f58ba39fa2d6dfa3398175f846729e","id":"review_2c0877cb-fa7e-4ed9-84a6-4d4ff11e4a9b","runId":"4f61dda1-5656-43ec-b84a-26aa80abd541","target":{"counterReportHash":"15c874cbb7b89e47ba68038cfd3c5d7864e43d3f6577d0a4755e9a911d6dd36f","draftHash":"cf53da6569bc39175fed174fd7b4616468cb560d8d8509879d692a0e913b7cd8","draftVersion":1,"evidenceSnapshotHash":"80b36017d79166d4d2f9440bad60625728a5f715f879adb910a04befcf30f96c","inputHash":"fdcd515ed080472d4ed73bb373c14675c3c2635013d7df58f0ac0cb0624e07c0","poolHash":"593513b5144a7d896b1bab903cc94af204ae3b28c7dadf20dfd1decf9bbebb57","poolVersion":1},"verdict":"approve","version":1}